ACERider.org --> Clippings --> Media Request: when was the last time you rode a train ?

ACERider Newsclippings

 
   Article last updated:
   Monday, May 21, 2001   2:45 AM MST
   
   Traffic jams an economic threat
   
   By Chris Tribbey
   STAFF WRITER
   
   The energy crisis isn't California's only serious economic problem,
   says one study.
   
   Shortly after a traffic study last month showed that the San
   Francisco-Oakland area had the second-worst traffic situation in the
   country, another study by two non-profit groups claimed that long-term
   congestion in the Bay Area and the state could be a bigger problem
   than the energy crisis.
   
   'A roads crisis'
   
   "The Bay Area faces a two-fold threat: power blackouts and traffic
   gridlock," said Jim Earp, executive director of the California
   Alliance for Jobs, which co-authored the study.
   
   "Energy shortages have caught the attention of California, but we also
   face a growing and potentially longer-lasting roads crisis," Earp
   said.
   
   The study, called Traffic Congestion: California's Economic Roadblock,
   uses figures showing three-quarters of all goods shipped from
   California are transported on trucks. Caltrans' figures show that
   twice as many freight trucks will be on California's highways in 2020.
   
   "Travel in California in the last decade increased 10 times faster
   (than additional lanes)," said Larry Fisher, executive director of
   Transportation California, a non-profit transportation group that
   co-authored the study.
   
   Wasted time in traffic
   
   The major problem, the study claims, is the amount of time and money
   people in the Bay Area, and in the state, waste sitting in traffic
   jams. According to the study, the average cost in lost time and gas
   due to gridlock is $760 per person in the Bay Area. Statewide, more
   than $20.7 billion is lost every year, the study claims, more than $3
   billion due to Bay Area congestion.
   
   "California has not done enough to expand or enhance its
   transportation systems, and the cost of traffic congestion threatens
   our economy," Fisher said.
   
   Headaches
   
   Then there are the headaches, which can never be properly tallied.
   
   The study claims that a trip on the highway taken during rush hour in
   the Bay Area takes twice as long as the same trip during non-commute
   hours. Because of congestion, a Bay Area driver wastes about 42 hours
   a year sitting in the car.
   
   The study makes some more or less obvious suggestions on how the
   country's most populated state can address congestion problems:
   
   Additional traffic and turn lanes must be added to many highways,
   especially those that now handle more traffic than they were designed
   to hold.
   
   More arterial options, such as "urban highway links," which would link
   major highways to areas that have grown in the past decade.
   
   More mass transit service. If the highways can't handle the load, give
   the commuters viable alternatives.
   
   Increase highway traffic speeds. The study claims that if traffic
   speeds were increased 12 to 15 percent, traffic flow would improve
   tremendously, without turning freeways into autobahns.
                               ______________
   
   Has Amtrak lost its appeal? When was the last time you rode a
   passenger train? Let us know.
          ________________________________________________________
                                      
           ©1999-2001 by MediaNews Group, Inc. and ANG Newspapers

ACERider.org